LAST ENTRY :-(

AGE: 21

SEX:female

WHAT IS YOUR DEGREE SUBJECT: Philosophy and Religious Studies

DOES BEING BAD RELATE WELL TO THE OTHER MODULES YOU ARE DOING: I think it does with Philosophy because you are able to add your own opinion to different topics, but not so much with religious studies, only when we talked about being to religious.

HAVE YOU FOUND BEING BAD TOO DEMANDING, TOO EASY OR AN APPROPRIATE LEVEL: i have found it OK it hasn't been too easy of too hard but this module had definitely made me think.

DO YOU THINK THE LIST OF TOPICS COVERED ON THE MODULE WAS APPROPRIATE: I did not quiet understand why we did bad cinema or bandits and outlaws. I felt that different people have different thoughts about what is a bad film.

ARE THERE ANY TOPICS WHICH WERE NOT INCLUDED WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEE INCLUDED: I would like to see a topic about modern problems like sex or homosexuality.

DO YOU THINK THE FORMAT FOR CLASSES HAS WORKED WELL: Yes the classes were good there was problems with how many people there was and about people talking and nothing was ever done about that problem and it effaced people in the class.

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE MODULE TEAM: The team was great, they did a good job on lectures and handouts, power points and discussion topics.

DO YOU THINK IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER TO HAVE HAD MORE:
SMALL GROUP DISCUSSIONS: I think it would of been good if we got split into small groups to do more in depth discussions about the topics.

DISCUSSION AND DEBATE AMONG THE CLASS AS A WHOLE: I think it would of been hard to have more debates and large group discussions because it was such a large group.

INFORMATION AND TALK FROM LECTURES: I thought the amount of information we was given in lectures was good.

THE APPROACH TAKEN IN THE MODULE IS INTERDISCIPLINARY, DO YOU THINK THIS IS A USEFUL WAY OF APPROACHING THE TOPICS COVERED IN THE MODULE: I think it did work because people and myself was really interested by the topics we covered and they was we covered them was good.

DO YOU THINK THAT INTERDISCIPLINARY MODULES ARE A GOOD IDEA: Yes

DO YOU THINK YOU HAVE BENEFITED FROM THE INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH TAKEN IN THE MODULE: I have benefited from the topics covered because i have learnt so much about the topics and how they can be interpreted.

WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE MORE MODULES THAT COVER THIS KIND OF SUBJECT MATTER: Yes i would i would like to see a module which covered modern day problems which we as students might have to deal with.

ARE YOU PLANNING TO TAKE THE FOLLOW UP MODULE PH2004 "IT SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED" AT LEVEL 2: Yes with out a doubt

WOULD YOU RECOMMEND "BEING BAD" TO A FRIEND: Yes, because i feel they can learn so many interesting topics from this module.

DO YOU THINK THAT THE BLOG WERE A GOOD IDEA: I thought that they were a good idea i think that more guidance should have been given but i have enjoyed doing them.

WHAT DID YOU THINK OF THE OTHER ASSESSMENTS: They were good but either needed to be one big essay at least, or two different types of things in which we are able to choose from other than stories.

WHAT HAVE YOU LEARNT FROM THE MODULE: I have learnt that all different things what we not consider as bad other people could like smoking is considered a bad thing for you health but not a bad thing which makes you a bad person, i have also learnt that all people have different opinions on different things and we should not judge them because of it.

WHAT PARTS OF THE MODULE HAVE YOU FOUND MOST USEFUL AND WHY:
i have found doing the web blog very useful because it has made me think about the issues which we do on a weekly basis on a daily basis and it was a piece of work which was constant from the beginning of the module to the end.

WHAT PARTS DO YOU THINK WERE A WASTE OF TIME AND WHY: i thought that the bad cinema was a bit pointless because we all have our own opinions to what is a bad film and what films can influences us.

ARE THERE ANY COMMENTS YOU WISH TO MAKE REGARDING "BEING BAD":
i think that overall the module was good and i will def be doing to follow up module in year 2.